{"id":13288,"date":"2021-02-01T18:18:06","date_gmt":"2021-02-01T18:18:06","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.environment-hawaii.org\/?p=13288"},"modified":"2021-02-01T18:48:15","modified_gmt":"2021-02-01T18:48:15","slug":"kehalani-developer-disputes-claim-of-a-promised-community-center","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/environment-hawaii.org\/?p=13288","title":{"rendered":"Kehalani Developer Disputes Claim Of a Promised Community Center"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>Much of the Land Use Commission\u2019s attention focused on the apparent inability and unwillingness of the Wailuku Plantation and its owner, Vernon Lindsey, to fulfill conditions of a 1990 district boundary amendment. However, RCFC Kehalani, LLC, which assumed obligations under that same boundary amendment, also came under fire for what residents of its development say are serious breaches of those conditions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>James Buika, a 14-year resident of the Kehalani subdivision, asked the commission to make sure that any stipulation agreement it approved include a specific requirement that RCFC Kehalani \u201cfollow through on required dedications that amount to millions of dollars of unmet obligations to date.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Buika noted that in its 2018 report to the LUC, \u201cthere is no mention of dedication of the required Community Center parcel as required under the original LUC Condition No. 7.\u201d His testimony included proposed language to be added to the stipulation: that bifurcation not take effect until the five-acre community center parcel is dedicated to the Kehalani Community Association and other dedications for parks and roadways are completed.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Livit Callentine echoed Buika\u2019s concerns. The 1990 decision and order approved by the LUC included a finding of fact, specifying that the Wailuku portion of the project (known now as Kehalani), \u201cwill be supported by a community center, parks, an open space system, and a school.\u201d As to parks, there were to be 110 acres of parks dedicated to the county.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>One such park has already been dedicated to the county, Callentine continued. \u201cHowever, this \u2018park\u2019 of approximately 7.5 acres has been closed under padlock and to my knowledge has never been open to the community,\u201d she said. \u201cFurther, this \u2018park\u2019 actually functions as a drainage basin, and the only lucky user of the \u2018park\u2019 is a herd of goats. It is my understanding that the owners within Kehalani Mauka and Kehalani Makai are paying for the maintenance of the \u2018park\u2019 that they do not own and are not allowed to access.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>As to the community center, Callentine said, when she purchased her condo in 2005, \u201cthe sales agent proudly pointed out there would be a community center\u2026 Further, within the first year of my occupancy, the managing agent for the Kehalani Community Association sent out a survey to all current owners seeking out our thoughts on what amenities we favored at the community center.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Karin Phaneuf, another Kehalani resident, made the same complaint. \u201cSince its inception, the Kehalani residents have taken a back seat to whichever developer was in charge of the community,\u201d she said. \u201cWe have gone for many years without the park on Waiale which is currently a playground for goats. In the past, all of the neighbors have really enjoyed that park and the community residents met regularly to walk their dogs and catch up with each other. The developer has locked up that park now for about eight years and we are unable to gather there. I believe it has been dedicated to the county now but it still continues to be locked up.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The community center \u201chas never come to fruition and the county keeps allowing the developers to build more homes, build more homes, build more homes, but not to finish the makai park (Prison View Park) for people (not goats) and to renege on their promise to build a much needed community center in our neighborhood. Neighbors have been holding meetings for years in the tiny trailer where the Kehalani administrators work. Please honor the people of Kehalani by holding this developer accountable for the project he purchased and for the promises the county agreed would be fulfilled back in the 1990s.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Randall Sakumoto, attorney for RCFC Kehalani, was asked about the residents\u2019 complaints by commissioner Dawn Chang.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u201cLet me ask one final question,\u201d Chang said. \u201cThere are outstanding dedications that \u2026 your clients have to fulfill?\u201d<br>Sakumoto agreed that there were \u201cstill certain things which need to be done,\u201d adding that he had been in discussions with the county about them. \u201cIt\u2019s not something we\u2019re hiding from or running from.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Commissioner Lee Ohigashi, following up on the same point, noted that in recent correspondence with Maui County, Sakumoto\u2019s client seemed to back-pedal on any commitment to follow through with construction of the community center.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Specifically, in an October 23 letter, Jeffrey Ueoka, another attorney representing RCFC, told the county\u2019s directors of parks and of planning that his client \u201cdoes not agree with the Planning Department\u2019s interpretation\u201d that it was bound by terms of the original decision and order to construct a community center.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In that letter, Sakumoto proposed that to resolve the question, RCFC \u201cshall petition the state Land Use Commission to clarify the issue. RCFC\u2019s expectation would be that the county support RCFC\u2019s petition at the state Land Use Commission to only require the dedication of the community center site,\u201d rather than construction of the center proper.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>When Ohigashi pressed Sakumoto on whether RCFC intended to petition the LUC for a finding on the question of whether the original LUC decision required the community center and also on the extent of park dedications that were to occur, Sakumoto said that his client was still \u201cawaiting a response\u201d from the county to that October 23 letter. \u201cSo I don\u2019t want to say there will be something coming \u2026 if it is resolved separately with the county.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>After still further questioning from Ohigashi, Sakumoto said, \u201cAfter bifurcation, we will respond to any inquiry the commission has. It\u2019s a complicated discussion. \u2026 I don\u2019t think it\u2019s necessarily tied to the bifurcation.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong><em>&#8212; Patricia Tummons<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Much of the Land Use Commission&rsquo;s attention focused on the apparent inability and unwillingness of the Wailuku Plantation and its owner, Vernon Lindsey, to fulfill conditions of a 1990 district boundary amendment. However, RCFC Kehalani, LLC, which assumed obligations under &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/environment-hawaii.org\/?p=13288\">Continued<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":13302,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[479,338],"tags":[7],"class_list":["post-13288","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-february-2021","category-land-use","tag-patricia-tummons"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/environment-hawaii.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13288","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/environment-hawaii.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/environment-hawaii.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/environment-hawaii.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/environment-hawaii.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=13288"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/environment-hawaii.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13288\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/environment-hawaii.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/13302"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/environment-hawaii.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=13288"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/environment-hawaii.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=13288"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/environment-hawaii.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=13288"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}