{"id":1116,"date":"2014-09-09T18:10:49","date_gmt":"2014-09-09T18:10:49","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/localhost:8888\/EH\/?p=1116"},"modified":"2015-02-27T22:04:04","modified_gmt":"2015-02-27T22:04:04","slug":"board-talk-22","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/environment-hawaii.org\/?p=1116","title":{"rendered":"BOARD TALK"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Opponents of Ka`ena Point Fence Are Denied Contested Case Hearing<\/b><\/p>\n

On August 12, the state Board of Land and Natural Resources denied the requests of Summer Kaimalia Nemeth and Huang Chi Kuo for a contested case hearing over a 600-meter predator-proof fence that resource managers plan to build to protect native seabirds and plants within the Ka`ena Point Natural Area Reserve and State Park.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

In January, the Land Board unanimously approved a right-of-entry to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and Hawai`i chapter of The Wildlife Society to construct the fence, which received broad support from the surrounding communities, as well as the Office of Hawaiian Affairs. But Nemeth, concerned about the cultural impacts of the fence, and Kuo, concerned about its biological effect, both requested a contested case hearing. Both are also associated with fishing interests.<\/p>\n

In its report to the board recommending denial of the requests, the Department of Land and Natural Resources\u2019 Division of Forestry and Wildlife noted that the decision to grant a right-of-entry for conservation management at Ka`ena Point \u2013 a decision taken by the board last January \u2013 was neither a quasi-legislative nor an adjudicatory action. Therefore, DOFAW administrator Paul Conry argued, the matter fell outside the purview of the Hawai`i Administrative Procedures Act, which governs contested case hearings. Instead, Conry wrote, the Ka`ena Point Ecosystem Restoration Project — which includes the fence and is a collaborative effort that includes the DLNR\u2019s Natural Area Reserves System and its Division of State Parks — falls under \u201cinternal management,\u201d as it is \u201cpart of on-going management efforts aimed at the preservation and recovery of native vegetation and wildlife within the Ka`ena Point Natural Area Reserve.\u201d<\/p>\n

Conry\u2019s report also pointed out that Kuo lacked standing because his arguments focused on environmental impacts, which should have been raised during the environmental assessment process.<\/p>\n

\u201cMr. Kuo does not have standing to challenge the EA through a petition for a contested case hearing,\u201d DOFAW stated.<\/p>\n

In her testimony before the board, Nemeth disagreed with DOFAW\u2019s reasoning, and added that a full environmental impact statement should be conducted for the fence. She also claimed DOFAW staff failed to give her adequate notice of her opportunities to testify on the fence project.<\/p>\n

In written testimony, Nemeth pointed out what she believed were several procedural violations. For example, she argued that the fence does not have a valid Conservation District Use Permit.<\/p>\n

\u201cThey state that the project falls under the existing CDUP which was created in 1982 for the formation of several NAR throughout the islands of Hawai`i. Nowhere in this outdated CDUP is there a mention of any type of construction within a NAR,\u201d she wrote.<\/p>\n

Marti Townsend of KAHEA: the Hawaiian-Environmental Alliance agreed and added that the fence should have its own CDUP.<\/p>\n

DOFAW, however, argued in its report, \u201cThe question of whether the 1982 CDUA [Conservation District Use Application] covered this project is subsumed in the issues regarding the EA. … The EA stated that based on conversations with staff from the DLNR Office of Conservation and Coastal Lands, a new CDUA would not be required for this project. Instead, the project was permitted under [the existing CDUP].\u201d<\/p>\n

Big Island Land Board member Rob Pacheco reminded Nemeth that the board was only deciding on the contested case issue and could not revisit its decision to grant the right-of-entry that day. He did, however, have some concerns about DOFAW\u2019s decision to deny Nemeth a contested case hearing, since petitioners seeking to retain their ability to exercise their traditional and customary practices have been granted standing in other cases.<\/p>\n

After an executive session with the board\u2019s attorney, Pacheco said he understood DOFAW\u2019s position better. The board then voted unanimously to approve DOFAW\u2019s recommendation to deny the contested case requests.<\/p>\n

After the vote, Nemeth said she intends to file an appeal and asked that all activity on the fence cease until the case is resolved. (For more on this issue, read our February 2010 \u201cBoard Talk\u201d column, available at\u00a0www.environment-hawaii.org.)<\/a><\/p>\n

***
\nBoard Approves NWHI Cruise,
\nSeal Aid, Cetacean Sampling<\/b><\/div>\n

 <\/p>\n

\u201cAlmost 100 percent of them suffer from malnutrition. … We know it\u2019s a lack of them being able to get enough resources,\u201d Charles Littnan, a monk seal researcher with the National Marine Fisheries Service\u2019s Pacific Islands Fisheries Science Center, told the Land Board August 12.<\/p>\n

That day, the board approved a Papahanaumokuakea Marine National Monument research permit to Littnan to continue seal-enhancement activities, including captive feeding and care of prematurely weaned, undernourished, or otherwise endangered young seals, and treatment for parasitic worms.<\/p>\n

Hawaiian monk seals are critically endangered; the mortality rate among seal pups, in particular, is especially high.<\/p>\n

Under Littnan\u2019s proposal, \u201cseals would be cared for in shore pens or transported to the Ford Island Research Facility in Honolulu with the intent to release them back to their natal site or Nihoa Island,\u201d a report by the DLNR\u2019s Division of Aquatic Resources states. If the Ford Island facility is not up and running in time to receive seals needing help, Littnan said, some could be housed temporarily at the Waikiki Aquarium or the Kane`ohe Marine Corps Base. He also noted that there are plans to open a captive care facility at the Natural Energy Laboratory Authority of Hawai`i site in Keahole, Kona.<\/p>\n

Littnan said that about four to five seals a year in the Northwestern Hawaiian Islands are found prematurely weaned.<\/p>\n

To alleviate the chronic malnutrition that pups experience, Littnan plans to administer anti-parasitic medication to them at Laysan (up to 41 seals), Lisianski (up to 29 seals), and French Frigate Shoals (47).<\/p>\n

\u201c[I]t has been noted that young seals infected with
\n… tape worms … tend to be in poorer body condition than those uninfected. While parasites are likely not a primary cause of mortality in monk seals, they may further compromise animals already in ill health due to food limitation, thereby increasing their likelihood of dying,\u201d DAR\u2019s report states.<\/p>\n

Littnan said that the worming trial is \u201cnot a silver bullet,\u201d but is a relatively quick and easy way to ease the stress on juvenile seals, up to 70 percent of which can die within a given year.<\/p>\n

Proposed Exemptions<\/i><\/b><\/i><\/p>\n

In addition to Littnan\u2019s permit, the Land Board approved two other monument permits on August 12: a research permit to Jay Barlow and Erin Oleson of the NMFS to identify and biopsy cetaceans as part of the 2010 Hawaiian Archipelago Cetaceans and Ecosystem Assessment Survey, and a conservation and management permit to allow the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration\u2019s research vesselMcArthur II<\/i>\u00a0to enter the monument.<\/p>\n

While she did not testify against either the monk seal or cetacean permits, Marti Townsend of KAHEA: the Hawaiian-Environmental Alliance, strongly opposed the issuance of the ship permit, noting that there have been three vessel groundings in the monument within the five years she has been monitoring the permitting process. She also stated that she had concerns about the DLNR\u2019s decision to exempt ship operations from environmental review.<\/p>\n

In its submission to the Land Board, DAR explained that existing exemptions for the DLNR \u201cappear to apply\u201d to ship operations. To further clarify which activities are exempt from the state\u2019s environmental review law, the DLNR recently submitted to the state Office of Environmental Quality Control proposed exemptions for a number of its divisions, including DAR.<\/p>\n

Although discussion of the proposed exemption list (awaiting approval from the state Environmental Council) was not on the board\u2019s agenda, Townsend pointed out that the list includes all monument permits, as well as every other type of permit or license the division issues.<\/p>\n

\u201cThese exemptions are so extremely broad, it\u2019s laughable. … If you\u2019re going to exempt everything, what\u2019s the point? You may as well overturn the law. Maybe that\u2019s what this administration wants,\u201d she said.<\/p>\n

In an August 6 letter to the OEQC, which Townsend also submitted to the Land Board, KAHEA called the DLNR\u2019s proposed exemption lists \u201cridiculously overreaching\u201d and argued that ship operations \u201cdo not satisfy any of the existing exemption classes and no environmental review has been conducted for ship operations in Papa\u00achanau\u00acmokuakea. Approving this permit would therefore be illegal. Yet, instead of simply conducting the environmental assessment, DLNR proposes the exact opposite of protecting this refuge by exempting not just ship operations, but every proposal to access the most fragile and highly protected marine ecosystem in the archipelago.\u201d<\/p>\n

(In a separate letter to the OEQC and to the DLNR, KAHEA, Life of the Land, Hawai`i\u2019s Thousand Friends, Hawai`i Community Stewardship Network, and several other environmental groups and individuals recommended that the Environmental Council reject the DLNR\u2019s proposed exemptions. Although the agenda had not yet been announced as of press time, the Environmental Council had scheduled to meet, for the first time since the summer of 2009, on September 14. For more on the subject of the exemption lists, see our June 2010 cover article and the write-up on Page Two of our August issue.)<\/p>\n

***
\nSecond Maui Wind Farm Wins Conservation District Use Permit<\/b><\/div>\n

\"image\"Not all big energy projects are controversial. When the Land Board approved a Conservation District Use Permit for a second wind farm on Maui last month, no one from the public showed up to testify, although representatives of the wind farm company, Kaheawa Wind Power II, LLC, were present to answer questions from the board.<\/p>\n

The 21-megawatt, $100 million farm will span 333 acres of unencumbered state land at Ukumehame along the access road that leads to the existing 30-MW Kaheawa Wind Farm I. In addition to erecting 14 GE 1.5 MW turbines, the company plans to use a battery system to stabilize the amount of power to Maui\u2019s small electricity grid. Both projects are owned by First Wind Energy, which is also developing a 30-MW wind farm at Kahuku on O`ahu\u2019s North Shore.<\/p>\n

The company is still negotiating terms of a lease for the two state parcels for Kaheawa II and must complete a Habitat Conservation Plan and secure a federal Incidental Take Permit and state incidental take license before construction can start.<\/p>\n

***
\nKawai Nui Restoration Project Finally Clears Funding Hurdle<\/b><\/div>\n

 <\/p>\n

\"image\"Division of Forestry and Wildlife administrator Paul Conry was officially on vacation, but came to work June 10 anyway, to celebrate.<\/p>\n

At long last, with the Land Board\u2019s approval of a partnership agreement with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, a much anticipated 80-acre wetland restoration and habitat enhancement project for Kailua\u2019s Kawai Nui Marsh will have the funding it needs.<\/p>\n

\u201cWe have been working with the Army Corps of Engineers, the county, partners in the community and our Legislature for 15 years to bring this project to life,\u201d Conry told the Land Board that day.<\/p>\n

In 1990, the Legislature ordered the transfer of Kawai Nui Marsh from the City and County of Honolulu to the state, but disputes over which government would be responsible for maintaining the marsh\u2019s flood control infrastructure delayed that transfer for nearly 20 years. The dispute jeopardized about $5 million in federal funds that had been appropriated for the waterbird project that the Army Corps and the Kailua community had devised in the meantime.<\/p>\n

The city, the Legislature and the Land Board finally agreed to the transfer terms in 2007, the environmental process was completed in early 2009, and, in March, Gov. Linda Lingle approved the release of the state\u2019s share of project funds.<\/p>\n

According to a DOFAW report to the Land Board, the project will restore 37.8 acres of habitat for the endangered Hawaiian duck (koloa), stilt (`ae`o), moorhen (`alae `ula), and coot (`alae ke`oke`o). It will also include 24 acres of 11 terraced shallow ponds, a berm, a solar-powered water supply system, and, if funding permits, predator control fencing.<\/p>\n

\u201cThe project also becomes the foundation for other educational, environmental, cultural, recreational, and ecotourism opportunities in the marsh,\u201d the report states.<\/p>\n

The agreement would commit the state to providing 25 percent of the $6.43 million project\u2019s costs, less design and engineering costs it has already paid, for a total of about $1.36 million. The Corps would cover the rest.<\/p>\n

State Rep. Chris Lee (51st District – Lanikai, Waimanalo) told the board, \u201cKawai Nui is a real diamond in the rough. This has been going on about as long as I\u2019ve been alive.\u201d<\/p>\n

The board unanimously approved the agreement.<\/p>\n

A contract for the project was scheduled to be awarded this month, with construction to begin in January and be completed in December 2011.<\/p>\n

(For more background on this project, read the following articles, available at\u00a0www.environment-hawaii.org:<\/a><\/p>\n